For many years, a large, powerful companies and governments to the idea of global warming has declined. Many of the original a long time widely recognized as an important resource in the defamation was. Well, "mainstream" in general the effects of climate change and is worried about the speech has been postponed. From their seats in the companies are in a disinformation campaign, nothing to regulate and control the Government has said on this issue. However, some companies and organizations to effective efforts to reduce climate change concerns and are working for. It is being developed and implemented publicity and spin, "green - washing" and misleading information in the standard, and now a solid solution to an important change in attitude and effort with a different kind of happens.
Climate Justice And Equity:
Developing countries and growing concern in the various non - governmental organizations and to create results for the population and poor countries, global warming talks should be. The effect of climate change in the world be felt in the poorest countries. In some cases, some of climate change on small island states is an effect. The climate of justice, fairness and sustainable development an important factor in this debate, are often outside the traditional speech. To all the people within and between nations and for justice in an atmosphere of equal rights.
It was agreed that the principle of discrimination on the common responsibilities.
This means that the United States, the Kyoto Protocol's resignation was as if the world, most countries signed the agreement on climate change are (including countries) agreed that this means that global warming is responsible for the rich countries , in the form of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere of several decades and centuries of rich countries and climate change, pollution emissions on developed countries to do more than the poor countries.
It is also necessary that the basic needs of poor countries and poverty alleviation for the response was agreed to. It seems that the poor countries to reduce emissions will agree it was inequitable, where the problems that lead to rich countries.
But some countries already have to show that the issues and can address rich countries to have started.
On these issues will be addressed in detail here.
Climate Change Flexibility Mechanisms:
Flexible mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol to combat climate change efforts in the context of reducing emissions to a number of options. You are in the following categories: emissions trading, Joint Implementation and Clean Development Mechanism. However, these are very controversial, because they essentially the United States and the United States in the treaty at the behest of the firm are doing. Some of these procedures has, indeed, to reduce emissions with the ratings, for example.
Carbon Sinks, Forests And Climate Change:
To benefit from carbon dioxide and climate change "carbon sink" to the idea of using global warming to deal with a proposal for a system. , This, afforestation, or planting new forests have been proposed to. Forestry and with the major interests of the countries is a strategy for the woodworking industry. Although the possibility of there in May of this solution, because the forests and the East, the basis of the ecosystem and biodiversity of forests rich in C is the destruction is justified is not effective (but today), the environment certainly (free) is for a decline. The establishment of new forest areas, the construction of the entire ecosystems. In addition to criticism of this view is not at the root are not the reality and efficiency of emission reduction or to support the reasons for a quick repair.
Climate Justice And Equity:
Developing countries and growing concern in the various non - governmental organizations and to create results for the population and poor countries, global warming talks should be. The effect of climate change in the world be felt in the poorest countries. In some cases, some of climate change on small island states is an effect. The climate of justice, fairness and sustainable development an important factor in this debate, are often outside the traditional speech. To all the people within and between nations and for justice in an atmosphere of equal rights.
It was agreed that the principle of discrimination on the common responsibilities.
This means that the United States, the Kyoto Protocol's resignation was as if the world, most countries signed the agreement on climate change are (including countries) agreed that this means that global warming is responsible for the rich countries , in the form of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere of several decades and centuries of rich countries and climate change, pollution emissions on developed countries to do more than the poor countries.
It is also necessary that the basic needs of poor countries and poverty alleviation for the response was agreed to. It seems that the poor countries to reduce emissions will agree it was inequitable, where the problems that lead to rich countries.
But some countries already have to show that the issues and can address rich countries to have started.
On these issues will be addressed in detail here.
Climate Change Flexibility Mechanisms:
Flexible mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol to combat climate change efforts in the context of reducing emissions to a number of options. You are in the following categories: emissions trading, Joint Implementation and Clean Development Mechanism. However, these are very controversial, because they essentially the United States and the United States in the treaty at the behest of the firm are doing. Some of these procedures has, indeed, to reduce emissions with the ratings, for example.
Carbon Sinks, Forests And Climate Change:
To benefit from carbon dioxide and climate change "carbon sink" to the idea of using global warming to deal with a proposal for a system. , This, afforestation, or planting new forests have been proposed to. Forestry and with the major interests of the countries is a strategy for the woodworking industry. Although the possibility of there in May of this solution, because the forests and the East, the basis of the ecosystem and biodiversity of forests rich in C is the destruction is justified is not effective (but today), the environment certainly (free) is for a decline. The establishment of new forest areas, the construction of the entire ecosystems. In addition to criticism of this view is not at the root are not the reality and efficiency of emission reduction or to support the reasons for a quick repair.
No comments:
Post a Comment